Summary
A Strategic Framework for CMOs Navigating the Shift from Campaign-Centric to System-Centric Revenue Generation
Executive Summary
B2B marketing stands at an inflection point. The campaign-driven, channel-focused demand generation model that defined the past two decades is experiencing terminal decline — not because practitioners are failing, but because the market has fundamentally transformed beneath it.
Three forces converge in December 2025 to demand a new approach: AI has become the primary research interface for B2B buyers, traditional attribution models have collapsed under privacy regulations and complex buyer journeys, and buying committees have expanded to unprecedented size and complexity. Organizations clinging to traditional demand generation frameworks are seeing pipeline efficiency decline while their AI-native competitors build compounding revenue engines.
This article introduces the Demand Systems Framework — a strategic architecture that replaces isolated channel optimization with integrated, intelligence-enabled orchestration. Drawing on recent research from McKinsey, Forrester, G2, and Gartner, we establish why the transition from demand generation to Demand Systems is inevitable, how leading organizations are making the shift, and what CMOs must do to remain competitive in 2026.
I. The Structural Breakdown of Traditional Demand Generation
The Data: Why Linear Models Are Failing
For twenty years, B2B demand generation operated on three foundational assumptions that no longer hold:
Assumption 1: Buyer journeys are sequential and observable
Reality: B2B buyers use an average of ten different channels to interact across all steps of their journey. McKinsey’s 2024 B2B Pulse Survey of nearly 4,000 decision makers found that 42% use more than 11 different touchpoints.
The buyer journey is no longer a funnel — it’s a networked ecosystem where buyers move fluidly between research, validation, and comparison across dozens of surfaces, most of which marketing teams cannot directly observe or influence.
Assumption 2: Marketing controls primary discovery mechanisms
Reality: Nearly half of B2B software buyers now start their buying journey in an AI chatbot instead of Google Search, and 87% say AI chatbots are changing the way they research. Up to 90% of B2B buyers now use tools like ChatGPT to research vendors.
When AI assistants become the front door to your market, traditional SEO and paid search strategies become necessary but insufficient. Buyers are forming preferences before ever visiting your website.
Assumption 3: Attribution can be mapped through definable touchpoints
Reality: B2B buyers refrain from engaging sellers directly until they’re approximately 70% through their buying process, and 78% have already established their requirements before initiating contact.
The “conversions” traditional attribution models measure are lagging indicators of buyer journeys that started months earlier in environments marketing cannot track: private Slack channels, AI assistant conversations, peer comparison spreadsheets, and dark social networks.
The Five Systemic Failures
Failure Mode 1: Channel Interdependency Blindness
When a buyer asks Claude or ChatGPT “What are the best marketing automation platforms?”, the AI’s response is shaped by your SEO footprint, content density, social proof distribution, structured data implementation, and thought leadership presence. A conversion appearing in your analytics as “organic search” may actually result from: thought leadership → AI discoverability → peer validation → search click → conversion.
Organizations optimizing individual channels miss these interdependencies, achieving local optimization while missing global performance gains.
Failure Mode 2: The Buying Committee Expansion Crisis
According to Forrester’s 2024 State of Business Buying Report, the average B2B purchase now involves 13 stakeholders, and nearly 89% of buying decisions cross multiple departments. Gartner research shows the average buying group for a complex B2B solution involves 8.2 stakeholders, up from 6.8 in 2015 — a 21% increase in under a decade.
Traditional demand gen, designed for 3–5 decision makers, cannot effectively orchestrate engagement across 13+ stakeholders with divergent priorities, scattered across departments, conducting independent research, and operating on different timelines.
Failure Mode 3: Signal Overload Without Intelligence Infrastructure
Modern B2B buyers emit signals across product usage telemetry, content consumption, search behavior (traditional and AI-mediated), community participation, intent data, technographic changes, hiring signals, and social engagement.
Marketing teams now have access to 50–100x more signals than in 2020, yet most lack the analytical infrastructure to synthesize them into predictive insights. This creates “data paralysis” — more information, worse decisions, slower response times.
Failure Mode 4: Organizational Structure Lags Strategic Reality
Most marketing organizations remain functionally siloed: SEO teams optimize for rankings, paid media teams for ROAS, content teams for engagement, demand gen for MQLs. Each team hits their numbers. The company misses revenue targets.
This is the classic systems problem: locally rational decisions producing globally irrational outcomes.
Failure Mode 5: The AI Visibility Gap
In less than two years, 89% of B2B buyers have adopted generative AI, naming it one of the top sources of self-guided information in every phase of their buying process. Yet only an estimated 15–20% of B2B organizations have implemented comprehensive AI Experience Optimization (AEO) strategies.
This creates “the invisibility trap”: companies invisible to AI systems become invisible to buyers, regardless of paid media spend or SEO rankings. AI recommendation algorithms function as a new, ungated funnel entrance — and most companies aren’t optimized to pass through it.
II. The Market Transformation: What Changed and Why It Matters
Force 1: AI-Mediated Discovery Has Reached Critical Mass
G2’s 2024 Buyer Behavior Report found that 69% of software buyers only engage with a salesperson after they’ve made a choice, and 34% of buyers say research is the longest stage in their buying process — a stage increasingly conducted through AI assistants rather than traditional search.
G2’s survey of over 1,000 B2B software buyers revealed that AI chat is now the top source buyers use to build software shortlists, fundamentally disrupting the traditional buyer journey.
Implication for CMOs: Companies that lack AI discoverability — clear structured data, entity coherence, semantic clarity, and proof density — are experiencing “AI visibility collapse” as model updates render them progressively more invisible.
Force 2: Privacy Regulations Demolished Traditional Attribution
Cookie deprecation, GDPR, CCPA, and iOS privacy updates have made deterministic, person-level tracking increasingly impossible. Traditional multi-touch attribution models depend on tracking individual users across devices and sessions — capabilities that are degrading rapidly.
Organizations must shift from deterministic attribution (this person did these things, therefore…) to probabilistic modeling (given these system conditions, this outcome becomes more likely). This requires sophisticated analytical infrastructure most marketing teams don’t possess.
Force 3: Remote and Digital Buying Became Permanent
McKinsey’s 2024 research shows that 69% of “seeker” archetype buyers would conduct transactions of $500,000 or more remotely, and 70% of B2B buyers prefer digital or remote interactions over in-person meetings.
The pandemic-era shift to digital buying didn’t reverse — it accelerated and became permanent. This fundamentally changes how demand must be created, captured, and converted.
Force 4: Economic Pressure Demands Efficiency
Forrester’s 2025 Budget Planning Survey showed 83% of B2B marketing decision-makers expect increased investment over the next 12 months, but 72% of European CMOs plan budget increases relative to sales in 2026 while under pressure to better explain marketing’s ROI.
CFOs demand precision. Boards want predictability. The only path to sustainable efficiency gains is system-level optimization, not incremental channel improvements.
III. Introduction to Demand Systems Theory
Defining the Demand System
A Demand System is an integrated, intelligence-enabled architecture that orchestrates all demand-creation and demand-capture activities as interdependent components of a unified revenue generation system.
Unlike demand generation (campaign execution), Demand Systems emphasize:
- Integration over isolation — channels and signals connected, not managed separately
- Orchestration over optimization — system-level design trumps channel-level efficiency
- Intelligence over activity — predictive clarity replaces volume metrics
- Compounding over linear scaling — network effects replace diminishing returns
The Fundamental Shift
Traditional demand gen asks: “Which channel drove this deal?”
Demand Systems ask: “What system conditions make deals more probable?”
This is the difference between mechanistic thinking (inputs → outputs) and systems thinking (feedback loops, emergent behavior, non-linear causality).
Consider: When buyers prompt AI with “Give me three CRM solutions for a hospital that work on iPads,” instantly creating a shortlist, the “attribution” question becomes meaningless. What created that moment? Your structured data? Your review presence? Your content density? Your thought leadership? Your social proof?
All of them. Simultaneously. In ways that interact and compound.
This is why channel attribution fails and systems thinking succeeds.
IV. The Five-Engine Demand Systems Framework
Based on patterns observed across high-performing B2B organizations, effective Demand Systems are built on five interconnected engines:
Engine 1: The Intent Intelligence Engine
Purpose: Transform disparate signals into unified, predictive intelligence
Modern buyers emit signals across:
- AI assistant queries (the new “top of funnel”)
- Product usage telemetry
- Content consumption patterns
- Traditional and AI-mediated search
- Community and social engagement
- Intent data from third-party providers
- Technographic and hiring signals
The Intent Intelligence Engine aggregates these signals, applies machine learning to identify high-probability opportunities, and predicts timing and likelihood of conversion.
Maturity Levels:
- Level 1 (Reactive): Separate dashboards for each signal type
- Level 2 (Integrated): Unified view of all signals
- Level 3 (Predictive): ML models forecasting likely converters
- Level 4 (Autonomous): System automatically adjusts resource allocation based on predictions
Critical for 2026: Deploy AI-powered intent detection specifically for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini queries. A massive 84% of B2B buyers now use review platforms as a primary research method during consideration, with AI sorting results by relevance to user needs — your intent engine must integrate these signals.
Engine 2: The Narrative Coherence Engine
Purpose: Ensure market-wide consistency and AI interpretability of brand positioning
The narrative challenge has fundamentally changed. It’s no longer about “what we say” — it’s about “what AI models reconstruct about us when queried.”
Components:
- Category Language Architecture: Establishes semantic framework defining your space
- Entity Optimization: Ensures proper representation across knowledge graphs
- Proof Distribution System: Deploys customer evidence across AI-crawled surfaces
- Thought Leadership Platform: Builds topical authority influencing AI training and retrieval
- Structured Data Implementation: Enables machines to accurately parse your value proposition
- Analyst/Influencer Network: Orchestrates third-party validation shaping AI responses
Why This Matters in December 2025:
With OpenAI, Anthropic, Google continuously updating models, companies lacking narrative coherence experience “AI visibility collapse” — moments when model updates suddenly render them invisible to buyers using AI research tools.
Key Metrics:
- AI Recommendation Rate: % of times your solution appears in AI responses for relevant queries
- Narrative Consistency Score: Alignment between your messaging and third-party descriptions
- Entity Completeness: How thoroughly knowledge graphs represent your offering
- Competitive Mention Ratio: Frequency of appearing alongside key competitors in AI contexts
Engine 3: The Experience Orchestration Engine
Purpose: Convert awareness into momentum through intelligent buyer pathway design
Traditional conversion optimization focused on individual page performance. Experience Orchestration focuses on pathway coherence across the entire journey, dynamically adapting based on real-time signals.
Components:
- Intelligent Content Routing: Serves next-best content based on behavioral signals and intent stage
- Friction Reduction Systems: Systematically removes obstacles to forward progress
- Activation Automation: Triggers engagement based on behavioral thresholds
- PLG-to-Sales Handoff Optimization: Orchestrates transitions between self-serve and assisted buying
- Lifecycle Momentum Systems: Maintains engagement velocity
- Proof-Point Delivery: Serves relevant evidence at decision uncertainty moments
2026 Best Practice:
Leading CMOs implement “momentum scoring” — measuring not just engagement, but acceleration. A buyer showing high product engagement but low content consumption gets different treatment than one demonstrating peer research behavior.
Engine 4: The Revenue Intelligence Engine
Purpose: Translate system complexity into strategic clarity and predictive capability
Of buyers who purchased AI platforms in the last three months, 83% reported their organization has already seen positive ROI. The winning organizations have Revenue Intelligence Engines that combine:
Components:
- Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM): Quantifies incremental contribution of each channel
- Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA): Maps touchpoint influence within observable journeys
- Predictive Analytics: Forecasts pipeline, revenue, and system performance
- Anomaly Detection: Identifies unexpected patterns requiring investigation
- Experimentation Framework: Enables rigorous testing with statistical validity
- Channel Elasticity Modeling: Determines optimal spend allocation
- Revenue Physics Dashboards: Tracks velocity, efficiency, payback, retention
The CFO Conversation:
With CMO representation and tenure among Fortune 500 companies continuing to fall, driven by business volatility and lingering questions about marketing’s value, Revenue Intelligence Engines enable CMOs to shift from storytelling to science: “Given current system conditions, we forecast $X pipeline with Y% confidence interval” — and consistently deliver.
Engine 5: The Commercial Activation Engine
Purpose: Connect demand creation to revenue realization through commercial orchestration
This engine ensures everything marketing generates can be effectively converted by the commercial organization — critical when 41% of B2B buyers already have a preferred vendor before formal evaluation begins.
Components:
- Segmentation & ICP Architecture: Defines ideal profiles and engagement strategies
- Lead Scoring & Routing: Ensures right opportunities reach right sellers at right time
- Sales Enablement Systems: Equips sellers with context, content, competitive intelligence
- Account-Based Orchestration: Coordinates marketing and sales for key accounts
- Partner Ecosystem Integration: Leverages partners as force multipliers
- Expansion Motion Design: Systematizes upsell and cross-sell
- Revenue Operations Hub: Provides unified view of revenue-generating activities
Why This Is a System:
When the average B2B purchase involves 13 stakeholders and 89% of decisions cross departments, the problem isn’t sales execution — it’s system design. The Commercial Activation Engine ensures structural alignment between demand creation and capture.
V. What CMOs Must Do Differently in 2026
The New CMO Mandate: From Storyteller to Systems Architect
Based on recent research, here’s what separates winning CMOs from those being replaced:
1. Embrace AI Discoverability as Core Strategy
Content Marketing Institute’s 2026 survey of over 1,000 B2B marketers found that teams winning in 2026 aren’t just playing with prompts or churning out more content. They’re building for AI discoverability.
Critical Actions:
- Deploy Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) alongside SEO/SEM
- Implement comprehensive structured data across all properties
- Build entity coherence across knowledge graphs
- Monitor how AI assistants represent your brand weekly
- Create content specifically designed for AI retrieval and recommendation
2. Build Intelligence Infrastructure, Not Just MarTech Stacks
When asked about improvements, marketers found that effectiveness came from teams getting better at their work — growing skills, cross-functional muscles, and ability to adapt. Technology without capability amplifies dysfunction.
Investment Priorities:
- Data engineering talent (not just marketing ops)
- Analytical infrastructure (data warehouses, ML platforms)
- Predictive modeling capabilities
- Experimentation frameworks with statistical rigor
3. Reorganize for Orchestration, Not Execution
Marketing leaders are reallocating to precision channels, moving away from generic reach into tactics that actually reach their ICPs and generate pipeline.
New Model: Cross-functional growth pods organized around outcomes
Example Pod Structure:
- Mission: Increase enterprise segment pipeline
- Composition: Content strategist, paid specialist, data analyst, SDR, product marketer
- Metrics: Pipeline generated, cost efficiency, conversion rate
- Autonomy: Full tactical control within strategic constraints
4. Master Probabilistic Forecasting for the CFO
72% of CMOs plan to increase budgets relative to sales in 2026, but they’re under pressure to better explain marketing’s ROI.
Required Shift: From “marketing drives awareness” to “given system conditions X, we forecast Y pipeline with Z% confidence, driven by these causal mechanisms.”
This requires causal inference frameworks, marketing mix modeling, and rigorous experimentation — capabilities that separate strategic CMOs from tactical executors.
5. Optimize for the Buying Committee Reality
Gartner reports that average buying committees have expanded to 11 members, leading to a 30% reduction in customers’ ability to reach purchasing decisions and a 42% decrease in likelihood of choosing premium solutions.
Strategic Response:
- Map all 11–13 typical stakeholders, not just champions
- Create role-specific content for economic buyers, technical evaluators, end users
- Design multi-threaded engagement strategies
- Build consensus-enabling tools (business case templates, ROI calculators, comparison matrices)
VI. The Implementation Framework: 90 Days to System Activation
Phase 1: Assessment & Architecture (Days 1–30)
Objective: Diagnose current state, design future state
Key Activities:
AI Visibility Assessment
- Test how Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini represent your brand
- Analyze structured data implementation gaps
- Evaluate content density and semantic optimization
- Benchmark AI recommendation rate against competitors
Signal Ecosystem Mapping
- Catalog all available buyer signals
- Assess signal quality, accessibility, integration status
- Identify critical blind spots (especially AI-mediated research)
KPI Architecture Redesign
- Move from activity metrics (MQLs, downloads) to system health metrics (momentum score, intent velocity)
- Establish leading indicators of system performance
- Design cross-functional scorecards aligned to revenue, not just marketing
Organizational Readiness Analysis
- Identify structural impediments to systems thinking
- Assess team capabilities in data science, AI, systems architecture
- Design new operating rhythms and decision rights
Deliverable: Comprehensive transformation roadmap with prioritized initiatives
Phase 2: Integration & Intelligence (Days 31–60)
Objective: Connect disconnected systems, deploy intelligence infrastructure
Key Activities:
Data Pipeline Unification
- Integrate MAP, CRM, product analytics, intent data, AI interaction data
- Establish single source of truth
- Deploy data quality frameworks
Channel Integration
- Unify SEO, SEM, AEO strategies under single orchestration
- Coordinate content and paid calendars
- Align product and marketing messaging
Predictive Model Deployment
- Launch AI-powered intent scoring
- Deploy propensity-to-convert algorithms
- Implement churn risk detection
Experience Pathway Optimization
- Redesign website for behavioral orchestration
- Implement intelligent content routing
- Deploy friction reduction initiatives
Deliverable: Functioning integrated demand system with basic intelligence
Phase 3: Orchestration & Optimization (Days 61–90)
Objective: Activate full orchestration, establish continuous improvement
Key Activities:
System-Wide Orchestration Launch
- Deploy automated cross-channel coordination
- Activate behavioral trigger systems
- Launch account-based orchestration
Organizational Restructuring
- Implement growth pod model
- Establish weekly system health reviews
- Deploy new incentives aligned to system goals
Advanced Analytics Deployment
- Launch marketing mix modeling
- Implement causal inference frameworks
- Deploy AI-driven optimization recommendations
Deliverable: Fully operational Demand System with compounding improvement mechanisms
VII. Industry-Specific Considerations
Enterprise SaaS
Unique Challenges:
- Long sales cycles (6–18 months)
- Average of 13 stakeholders across multiple departments
- High importance of product-led signals for expansion
System Design Priorities:
- Intent Intelligence focused on account-level orchestration
- Experience Engine optimized for multi-stakeholder engagement
- Strong integration between product usage and marketing systems
- Commercial Activation Engine designed for consensus-building
Mid-Market B2B SaaS
Unique Challenges:
- Volume-dependent economics
- Product-led growth as primary acquisition
- Need for marketing efficiency at scale
System Design Priorities:
- Automated experience orchestration
- PLG-optimized activation sequences
- Strong focus on viral/referral mechanisms
- Efficient intelligence infrastructure (higher automation, lower manual analysis)
Professional Services
Unique Challenges:
- Relationship-driven sales
- Long consideration periods
- High importance of thought leadership and trust
System Design Priorities:
- Narrative Engine with heavy thought leadership emphasis
- Intent Intelligence focused on relationship signals and reputation tracking
- Strong integration with partner ecosystem
- Experience Engine optimized for credibility-building over conversion velocity
VIII. Looking Forward: CMO Priorities for 2026
As we close 2025 and enter 2026, research reveals what separates winning marketing organizations from those struggling:
Priority 1: Shore Up the Core
Forrester’s Q3 2025 CMO Pulse Survey found that improving customer experience claimed the #1 spot for B2C CMOs, while creator/influencer marketing dropped from #2 to #16. The pattern is clear: in volatile times, foundational excellence matters more than trendy tactics.
For B2B, “the core” means:
- AI discoverability and structured data
- Unified data infrastructure
- Predictive intelligence capabilities
- Cross-functional orchestration
- Measurement rigor
Priority 2: Make AI Operational, Not Experimental
McKinsey’s State of Marketing Europe 2026 found that 94% of European marketing organizations are yet to advance their gen AI maturity, but the 6% who describe their gen AI use as mature have seen 22% efficiency gains.
The opportunity gap is enormous. AI-driven tools lead 2026 investment priorities for B2B marketers, but most implementations remain shallow — faster content creation rather than systematic intelligence.
2026 Winning Use Cases:
- Predictive pipeline forecasting
- Automated intent scoring and routing
- AI-powered content personalization (not generation)
- Smart research assistants for account intelligence
- Behavioral orchestration engines
Priority 3: Optimize for Trust and Preference
41% of B2B buying decision-makers have a favorite vendor at the start of their purchasing process according to Forrester’s 2024 Buyers’ Journey Survey — if you’re not that vendor, it will be hard to break through.
Strategic Implication: The goal is capturing “pole position” before purchase preferences form. This requires:
- Consistent presence across AI research interfaces
- Thought leadership that shapes category perception
- Social proof distributed across review platforms
- Brand building that creates preference before problem recognition
Priority 4: Build for Economic Volatility
With CMO tenure declining and economic uncertainty rising, leaders must be strategic and focused about market segment prioritization.
Critical Actions:
- Hyper-focused ICP targeting (quality over breadth)
- Ruthless prioritization of market segments
- Strategic withdrawal from low-probability markets
- Concentration of resources on winnable battles
Priority 5: Prove Marketing’s Strategic Value
Marketers rank new headcount, training, and team development among the lowest 2026 budget priorities — for all the talk about tech stacks and tools, most improvements came from teams getting better at their work.
The path to budget growth: demonstrate strategic value through predictable revenue contribution. This requires systems that compound, intelligence that predicts, and measurement that proves causality.
IX. Conclusion: Channels Don’t Scale — Systems Do
We stand at a fundamental inflection point in B2B marketing evolution.
The channel-centric, campaign-driven demand generation model that dominated 2005–2025 is experiencing terminal decline. Not because practitioners are failing to execute, but because the model itself has become structurally misaligned with market reality.
The Evidence Is Clear:
- 87% of B2B buyers say AI is changing how they research, and half now start in AI chatbots instead of Google
- Average buying committees have expanded to 13 stakeholders across multiple departments
- Buyers use an average of 10 channels, with 42% using more than 11
- Buyers are 70% through their process before engaging sellers
- 89% of B2B buyers have adopted generative AI as a top information source
Traditional attribution is impossible. Linear buyer journeys don’t exist. Channel-by-channel optimization produces diminishing returns.
The Strategic Response: Demand Systems
Organizations making the transition to Demand Systems achieve:
- Superior pipeline generation at lower cost
- Compounding returns rather than diminishing returns
- Predictable revenue rather than volatile performance
- Sustainable competitive advantage in AI-mediated markets
Organizations that don’t will find themselves trapped in an expensive, decreasingly effective cycle of campaign execution — visible to fewer buyers, resonating with smaller audiences, generating less efficient pipeline.
The transition is difficult. It requires investment in intelligence infrastructure, patience for compounding returns, organizational redesign, and new capabilities in data science, systems architecture, and AI optimization.
But the economic case is clear. 83% of organizations report positive ROI from AI investments. Mature AI users see 22% efficiency gains. Companies with integrated systems generate 2–3x higher marketing-influenced revenue.
The strategic imperative is undeniable. Buyers have moved to AI-first research. Committees have expanded beyond traditional engagement models. Attribution has become probabilistic. These shifts are permanent.
The competitive advantage is substantial. Early movers in AI discoverability, systems integration, and intelligence infrastructure are establishing compounding advantages their competitors cannot quickly replicate.
The future belongs to systems, not channels.
The future belongs to intelligence, not activity.
The future belongs to orchestration, not optimization.
The question for CMOs isn’t whether to build Demand Systems.
The question is: how quickly can you begin?
References and Citations
- McKinsey & Company. (2024). “McKinsey B2B Pulse 2024: Five Fundamental Truths — How B2B Winners Keep Growing.” McKinsey Global B2B Pulse Survey, April 3–24, 2024; n = 3,942 B2B decision-makers across 34 sectors in eight major industries in 13 countries. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/five-fundamental-truths-how-b2b-winners-keep-growing
- G2. (2024). “2024 Buyer Behavior Report.” Survey of 1,900+ B2B software buyers. https://research.g2.com/hubfs/2024-buyer-behavior-report.pdf
- G2. (2025). “How AI Chat is Rewriting B2B Software Buying.” Survey of 1,000+ B2B software buyers, August 2025. https://learn.g2.com/ai-search-surging-for-b2b-buyers
- G2. (2024). “The Impact of AI on B2B Buyer Journey: Key Statistics from G2.” https://learn.g2.com/ai-in-b2b-buyer-journey
- Luxid Group. (2025). “How AI is Transforming the B2B Buyer Journey.” https://www.luxidgroup.com/blog/how-ai-is-transforming-the-b2b-buyer-journey
- Forrester Research. (2024). “B2B Buyer Adoption of Generative AI.” Forrester’s Buyers’ Journey Survey, 2024. https://www.forrester.com/report/b2b-buyer-adoption-of-generative-ai/RES181769
- Forrester Research. (2024). “The State of Business Buying, 2024 Report.” Referenced in multiple sources including Traction Complete and other industry analyses.
- 6sense. (2024). “Navigating the B2B Buyer’s Journey in 2024.” Survey of B2B purchase behaviors. https://medium.com/@dexterwrites2022/navigating-the-b2b-buyers-journey-in-2024-insights-and-strategies-for-modern-b2b-marketers-ec874d697874
- Sopro. (2025). “68 B2B Buyer Statistics for 2025.” State of Prospecting 2025 report. https://sopro.io/resources/blog/b2b-buyer-statistics-and-insights/
- Buttered Toast. (2025). “B2B Buying Trends 2024 Infographic.” https://butteredtoast.io/b2b-buying-trends-2024-infographic/
- Gartner. (2024). Multiple reports on B2B buying committee size and complexity, as referenced in The Drum, ANNUITAS, and other industry publications.
- Content Marketing Institute. (2025). “B2B Content and Marketing Trends: Insights for 2026.” 16th annual content marketing survey conducted with MarketingProfs, sponsored by Storyblok. Survey fielded June 24–August 14, 2025; n = 1,015 B2B marketers. https://contentmarketinginstitute.com/b2b-research/b2b-content-marketing-trends-research
- Forrester Research. (2025). “The Top Five Initiatives For B2C CMOs In 2026.” Forrester’s Q3 2025 CMO Pulse Survey; n = 128 US B2C marketing executives. https://www.forrester.com/blogs/the-top-5-initiatives-for-b2c-cmos-in-2026/
- Forrester Research. (2025). “Five Strategic CMO Moves Heading Into 2026.” Based on Forrester’s Budget Planning Survey, 2025, and Buyers’ Journey Survey, 2024. https://www.forrester.com/blogs/five-strategic-cmo-moves-heading-into-2026/
- McKinsey & Company. (2025).
